Last week we wrote off the word "Indian" as a descriptor - a term so out of date that even the federal government has abandoned it. This week let's talk about the OTHER N-word.
NATIVE.
The word itself is fairly innocuous. Its roots are the latin word "natus", to be born; and it simply refers to a person or thing who is originally from a specific place. That's why Canada's original inhabitants have been referred to as the "native" people of North America. But it's tricky. I once attended a meeting at which a non-Aboriginal consultant rashly introduced herself to the Aboriginal Board of Directors as a "native of Montreal". The good-natured razzing she took for that faux-pas underlines the confusion inherent in the word. When a scientist describes a plant species as "native" to Canada, that's clear enough. But it’s not so clear when talking about people. So if you’re a native Edmontonian - does that mean you’re Aboriginal?
Like "Indian", the word "native" has also acquired a slightly unsavoury scent over the years. Think about the disapproval inherent in the phrase 'what’s with those natives?’. And is anyone going to be flattered when they're accused of "going native'?
So I fear it's time to bid a reluctant farewell to the word "native" as well. It's a shame, in a way: I've always liked the fact that it’s in our national anthem, and that thousands of Canadians every day sing about "our home and native land". (And even better when they sneak in the line "our home ON native land"). But somehow, I don't think that's what Robert Stanley Weir had in mind.
So I’d say let’s nix the "native", and let's try again.
Next Week: How about "Aboriginal"?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please review our comments policy, posted here: http://ccg-ourtimes.blogspot.com/p/comments-policy.html
Comment Moderation has been enabled; your comment will be reviewed by the Editors before posting. Our kids, parents, spouses, friends and clients read this site. So please be nice.